You’re recharqcterizing what is an apparent attempt to intimidate jurors who should be making their decisions strictly based upon their reasonable interpretation of the facts. I don’t think Trumpists are going to win support by behaving like bullies.

You need to educate yourself on cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School. Marxism is much broader than you suggest.

I don’t. It is intimidation. I do not seek to emulate the left. My morality is superior.

I don’t think your response addresses the substance of the article. The Constitution makes provisions for amendment. The Marxists want the whole thing to be scrapped because it is an impediment to their plans to institute a totalitarian system.

Hey now that’s a cogent argument!

If the judiciary is totally corrupt, who decides the facts, the mob? Does the fiery-eyed, salivating horde with torches and pitchforks decide the facts? Do we go back to trial by burning or drowning? Do the ignorant with strong certain opinions win the day?

So, nearly 3 years later, why has none of this been proven in court?

If a national monument was established for every victim of unjust violence the country would be filled with national monuments. Unfortunately, victimhood seems to be a major component of American politics.

We need to have discernment so that we trust those who are trustworthy and don’t trust those who are not. Otherwise is cultic.

Yep. More profiting on human misery by the military-industrial-pharmacological complex.