![](/static/c15a0eb1/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0da8d285-3457-4e5b-af21-b38609b07eea.webp)
Ah, I see. That’s the efficiency they’re looking for.
pending anonymous user
Ah, I see. That’s the efficiency they’re looking for.
I used to use dedicated server from OneProvider in Paris.
Disable iCloud backups, and do backup manually with iTunes plus the backup password set.
Run Wireshark on the client to see if you actually got the reply.
I recently switched to NextDNS. I used to run my own AdGuard Home with multiple DNS provider as upstream.
Is the worth as news? Ain’t that an open secret already?
Say I lived there. BBC needs fundings I get it, but what the BBC contributes to when I watch VoD? Not even watching live programmes as zero of the content have BBC ever contributed. When the content is licensed via BBC, I already paid part with my subscription. Thst’s a disgusting double dipping. If no one watches your programmes that’s your problem, and citizens have no responsibility to keep a corporate from collapsing. This shit reminds me of how NHK works in Japan.
I think to use it defensively, you should put the path into robots.txt, and only those doesn’t follows the rule will be greeted with the maze. For proper search engine crawler, that’s should be the standard behavior.
If I understand correctly, you want a two component setup. A PWA client for you to read the mail, and a server acts as IMAP client, fetches mails from all you mailboxes. The server will expose an API for tge PWA to access mail content. When new mail arrives, the server push a beacon via the Push API. The PWA would fetch the sender and title, and display a notification. If you clicks it, only then the PWA will fetch the body.
After a quick glance of the demo, I think SnappyMail fit the bill? It seems can be installed as PWA, and my browser does ask me if I want to give it push notification permission. However, I’m not too sure if the fetch logic happens as I laid out.
https://lemmy.ml/post/15430684
I asked a similar question before. Some recommended Revolut. Haven’t try yet tho.
And remember, once the price goes up, it rarely goes down. Even after the tariffs reverted in the future.
In the end, only the customer pays extras.
AFAIK, any. But expect performance lost due to bottoneck in bandwidth. Even the latest TB5 is only slightly faster than PCIe 2.0 x16. OCulink 2.0 can achieve PCIe 4.0 x8 which is way better, but Surface Pro have neither.
Or better, run your own instance, rather than a VPN.
Ain’t google needs phone number to get an account?
Got constant invalid iOS player response lately. Guess this doesn’t work anymore.
While I’m using Proton rn, I’m planning to migrate to Posteo with Addy.io for aliases. However they all cost money. If you mean free email that’s not tie to a billionaire, I can’t think one off my head. You can achieve “free” by hosting your own email server as it sounds you’re intended for receiving only, but the electricity still cost some, plus you are doning free labor to make sure it is happy.
Apologies. Never realized American spell it as check. Got confused.
Despite the bad title, the article itself is worth a read, though the topics covered are being discussed long ago, but serves as a good reminder.
A point the author raises is about data security in end-to-end encrypted communications when using with AI. Remember that end-to-end encryption is specifically protecting data in transit? It doesn’t do anything after the data is delivered to the end device. Even before the age of “AI”, the other end can do whatever he wants on that piece of data. He can shared the communication with another person next to him which the sender might or might not know of, upload it to social media, or hand it to the law enforcement. And the “AI” the tech industry going forward is just an other participant of the communication built right into the device. It can do exactly the same as any recipients wants to. It can attempt to try to (badly) summarize the communication for you, submit that communication to any third party, or even report you for CSAM as it determines your engaging in “grooming behavior.”
And the author also asked the question, “Who does your AI agent actually work for?” However, this question is already been answered by Windows Recall, the prime example of an AI agent. It collects data in an attempt to “help” us recall things in the past, but it will answer questions from anyone have access to it. Be it, you, your family/friend, or even law enforcement. The answer is anyone.
Meanwhile, the UK is asking for blanket access to all data from Apple.
Also, how expensive is it to get updates from Cisco and patch those routers?