How do you know that the content was illegal if it’s E2E encrypted?
Ⓐ ⏚ ↯ ⧖
How do you know that the content was illegal if it’s E2E encrypted?
Same ideas, worded differently: https://i.redd.it/x6q4jkkc43xc1.jpeg
All 3 can see the game without supports or accommodations because the cause(s) of the inequity was addressed. The systemic barrier has been removed.
(original post: https://old.reddit.com/r/coolguides/comments/1ceonlj/a_cool_guide_equality_equity_and_justice_breaking/)
Next level: stick the price tag of organic bananas on a tray of meat.
https://telegra.ph allows you to post text (and pictures) without having to create an account …and is accessible from the Tor browser ;)
In Europe, many merchants allow you to order online and collect (and pay for) the goods from their premises. For example: https://www.galaxus.com/en/wiki/556
Great! Then now you’re ready to install Microsoft Edge on your fresh new linux installation: https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/edge/pool/main/m/microsoft-edge-stable/ 🤡
Because we are talking about unacceptable female nipple, isn’t it?
Or maybe the problem isn’t the nipple itself, but the context in which it’s shown.
And, after all, your are still free to put OP’s male nipple on these pictures :)
Yeah, and all nipples are not equal.
Here’s my lazy and unpopular solution
When I go to x.com I end up on twitter.com
So Elon says it’s 𝕏 but my browser still says it’s Twitter
I’ve long used SAS.planet 🌐 to import maps from OpenStreetMap, Navionics or GoogleMap and then export them in Garmin format.
You’ll have to scour specialist forums to find the right configurations/settings, but it’s possible.
Anonymity is not the problem (who you are). When people are voting we need confidentiality (what you do).
When you go to the polling station, you may come across your neighbor or friends. You recognize them (no anonymity), but you don’t know what they’re voting for (this is confidentiality).
Most barriers are only mental, in people’s minds
Electronic voting can be a good thing, depending on how it’s implemented.
It could encourage young people to get more involved and participate in political life (the low turnout for votes and elections is worrying).
Technologies like blockchain (no, I’m not talking about cryptocurrency) can bring security and confidentiality.
As long as this solution can exist alongside traditional voting (by mail or at the polling station), I don’t see any problem.
Haha ! good question, probably never happened…
That’s precisely the nature of progress: to create what doesn’t yet exist.
Once again, you confuse authority with discipline. What is ruled by consensus don’t need to be enforced by authority.
You’re confusing anarchism with anomie…
Anarchism is not the absence of rules, but rules agreed between everyone outside any form of authority.
The most discreet and anonymous among them, because anarchists should never fall into the cult of personality.
ok, I see… I’ve never really understood the point of cryptography in public discussions as anyone can read the messages anyway.