It is because all you had was those weird black and orange taffies. No-one can eat those.
It is because all you had was those weird black and orange taffies. No-one can eat those.
Are these people verified in any way?
Vance is the creepy kind of weird that wants to spy on women and track their periods.
Oh my gosh! This sounds like it could go badly for his campaign in so many ways.
DO IT!
I quit them about 10 years ago when I asked for spinach on my sandwich and they gave me 3 small leaves of spinach for an upcharge. That and their instantly stale tasting bread made me done with the particular store and all Subway stores. Was a shame, because they were convenient to where I worked.
In no place does Trump specify which ideas he disagrees with in Project 2025. He just doesn’t want to be associated with it. He is not really disavowing the ideas though, AFAIK. And at least for the anti-choice people, Trump has done much that is in line with Project 2025. And he mirrors many of their ideas on immigration.
In no place does Trump ever specify which ideas he disagrees with. He just doesn’t want to be associated with it. He is not really disavowing the ideas, AFAICT. It kind of makes me mad that it is being reported that he is distancing himself from P2025. Because… not really.
Maybe I agree with some of this comment. But that “honey” at the beginning comes off as pretty patronizing. At least, to me.
Those nations should pass resolutions forbidding Israel from setting up settlements within their border and cutting off water to their populations. Completely useless resolutions, but it would put a fine point on it.
How so?
Says the man who showed up late for one of the debates in one of the last election, presumably because he didn’t want to be covid tested.
But what about another situation no-one is talking about!
Damn. This is a great response!
Bet you are white and male.
Further back we had Scanner Dan and Cosmo di Madison.
You know, not having read Wikipedia on Israel, and not taking a stand, those that think Wikipedia is biased could put up a simple wiki like page that lists the biases and rewrites the article in a way that they would consider unbiased. This would be in the spirit of Wikipedia. People could really decide for themselves.
Maybe educate people when they do wrong? Instead of judging them as stupid or wrong?
I am posting so I can come back. I hope it will be explained.
I believe you, that something like this was said, but in this age where the web is at our command, “some evangelical somewhere said that” seems needlessly vague and unconvincing.