![](/static/c15a0eb1/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4271bdc6-5114-4749-a5a9-afbc82a99c78.png)
questionable?
questionable?
Microsoft should replace support team with llm chatbot. Much better.
Most comments mention this, I feel less amount of information (even on ‘nerd’ topics) and more repetition of same idea/meme. I still use reddit (without account) to find useful info.
Back in reddit days I used it more than I use lemmy nowadays. In many communities, doom scrolling will soon lead you to posts months old here, which is I guess a good thing in some way?
Also this place isn’t as congested as reddit so virtually no annoyance like bots and shilling and scams going on.
less “meme dunking” karma type comments.
this. I miss that from reddit days
The arguments against ‘ultra processed’ food IMO are twofold. First, in some countries, additives are poorly regulated and enforced, hence food sometimes contains harmful substances. Though I think it it fairly rare.
Second, most ‘ultra processed’ food in discussion are commercial fast food. Being ultra processed, they contain same energy and fat in less volume due to low indigestible junks. So people can eat them more. And due to over commercialization they are often made addictive with flavoring. This means you’ll binge eat and come for more. This over consumption of macro nutrients and sometimes elimination of micro nutrients due to cost effective processing makes what is unhealthy about such food.
So if the production is honest about ingredients (verified by regulatory tests), you calculate your daily nutrients intake to be in recommended range and you don’t fall for addiction easily, go for any ultra super processed food, no harms done.
(There are evidence of dietary fibers helping prevent certain types of colon cancers but unless you’re eating only sugar stuffs, most food in market contains enough of that, how much processed it be).
It is a wrapper where content blockers can’t be installed, unlike a browser.
While you can’t directly upload to scihub, https://libgen.li/librarian.php is an option. Eventually some from here might end up in scihub but it doesn’t matter.
edit: I knew a researcher who used to send articles (own and others downloaded through institute) directly to Alexandra over email. But that was a while ago, no idea if that still works.
Interesting
Few article I saw, all are very basic and low quality. How’s that ‘escalating’?
I ‘hate’ wikimedia foundation for one thing: they complied and gave away editors email to court and censored one page upon fraudulent lawsuit by a propaganda news channel in India. Sure if they didn’t, they might get threatened to be blocked in India but I really doubt it would’ve hold long enough given that whole wikipedia can be downloaded fairly easily (or it is trivial to set up a mirror). They probably won’t get donations though in that case :/ so probably the move is reasonable?
This, also publish subscriber only and secretly upload to sci-hub
The buttons are intended to be placebo except in some places.
deleted by creator
Dropping onions in boiling baby makes more sense.
deleted by creator
OpenVMS: ‘I’m in trouble’
nope, then you’d see some of same species showing the behaviour, others not.