Hosting a mail server is really easy. Making sure Hotmail, Gmail and others accept your emails is a nightmare.
I don’t host my own email, I just delegate my email management to a small provider.
Hosting a mail server is really easy. Making sure Hotmail, Gmail and others accept your emails is a nightmare.
I don’t host my own email, I just delegate my email management to a small provider.
By mail: This seemed like a possible option. However I found that Slovak Post forbids sending banknotes or coins of any value via regular mail (for which shipping would cost €1.60) and instead only allows them in insured packages in which case the shipping would be €20.50 💀
I’m not aware of Slovakian law. But every other postal service in western Europe bans sending cash by mail for insurance reason. They don’t want you to ask for the money back if it doesn’t reach the destination. But they actually don’t track down people sending money. I’ve sent cash by mail many times without any issue. Hide it in a folded A4 paper, so that it’s not visible when looking through the envelope, and it should be fine, it has a 99.99% of arriving like any other letter.
That’s my 2 cents.
Unfortunately this is a nightmare to regulate. Whatever regulation a government will come up with, amazon (and all other big tech) will do everything to maliciously comply.
Look at the french regulation on book prices. The french “directorate for competition, consumers, fraud punishment” told amazon that they could not sell books with free shipping. Books have regulated price in France to garantee equal access to everyone everywhere. The DGCCRF claimed that offering free shipping de facto lowered the price of the books and was unfair to small local book shops. The next day, amazon introduced €0.01 shipping for books…
I’m all for regulating these assholes to ensure fair competition. But regulating them is not as simple as some people make it sound like. I would hate to be a lawmaker.
Calling whataboutism is a logical fallacy used to justify having different standards for yourself and your adversaries. Anybody using whataboutism in place of an actual can be safely dismissed as a troll. Meanwhile, western media is certainly no less biased than CGTN and has been caught lying about China repeatedly.
What are you on? Whataboutism is not a logical fallacy. We are talking about the bias of CGTN, and you say “what about western media?” Yeah western media are also biased, but it doesn’t take away the fact that CGTN is a heavily biased media outlet, highly biased towards positive chinese news. I never mentioned any western media or said they were superior, but to avoid talking about this difficult topic, you change the narrative. Did I mention anything about western media? No! Because that’s not the topic.
Whataboutism is not a logical fallacy. Far from it. Whataboutism has been heavily documented as a propaganda technique by many sociologists and rhetoric scientists:
Small remark instead of /u/… you should use the at-sign to mention somebody. For example: Hey @[email protected].
This is just whataboutism. Talking about the US doesn’t remove any critique of china. We were talking about China here. And CGTN (the news source which was linked) has a documented bias towards china
OP is a CCP-chill:
On lemmy? No. The devs decided to do a single page app with a REST API, which leads to the sluggishness and slow load-time. kbin (which is compatible with lemmy’s content) is your best bet, IMHO. https://kbin.fediverse.observer/list
I’m too used to lemmy unfortunately, and kbin is far from perfect.
The issue is the compatibility. You can follow Lemmy from Mastondon, but not vis-versa.
Lemmy is pretty dismissive of the rest of the fediverse.
Quand on voit la tendance à la hausse depuis sarko, c’est inquiétant…
Je suis loin d’être un défenseur de la police, mais en cliquant sur des points au hasard (j’ai pas sélectionné), je tombe sur des trucs comme:
29/08/2011, Neuilly-sur-Seine (Hauts-de-Seine) - La police se met à la poursuite d’un homme en scooter fuyant un contrôle. Il brûle un feu rouge, percute un véhicule qui, selon ses poursuivants, passait au vert. Il chute et meurt. Une enquête est ouverte.
Qu’aurai du faire la police? Le laisser filer?
07/01/2016, Paris (Paris) - Vers 11h30, un homme se rend au commissariat de la Goutte d’Or (18ème). Armé d’un hachoir, il aurait tenté d’agresser un agent en criant « Dieu est Grand » en arabe. Les policiers ouvrent le feu. Une ceinture d’explosifs factice est retrouvée sur le corps du suspect, ainsi que des références à l’organisation “Etat Islamique”. Plusieurs témoins contestent la version policière, affirmant que l’homme n’était pas armé et n’aurait pas crié. La famille du défunt déclare que Tarek Belgacem, de nationalité tunisienne, se rendait au commissariat pour actualiser ses papiers. La section antiterroriste ouvre une enquête à son encontre pour “tentative d’assassinat sur personne dépositaire de l’ordre public”. De son côté, son père porte plainte contre X pour “homicide volontaire”.
Ça m’a l’air d’être clairement un suicide par policier.
26/02/2019, Bourgoin-Jallieu (Isère) - Vers 19h15, un couple de retraité, Geneviève et Florencio, à bord de leur voiture meurent dans une collision impliquant six voitures près d’un rond-point à hauteur du boulevard Irène et Frédéric Joliot-Curie. L’accident est provoqué par un gendarme en dehors de son service conduisant sa voiture occupée par un collègue et deux enfants. L’homme vient de fêter des retrouvailles durant lesquelles il consomme plusieurs litres d’alcool. Le gendarme est mis en examen pour « homicide involontaire ». L’IGGN mène une enquête. Deux jours après les faits, le militaire est condamné à trois ans de prison dont dix-huit mois ferme par le tribunal correctionnel. Les enfants des victimes accusent la justice de faire un exemple pour couvrir les collègues du conducteur par une « enquête baclée ».
J’ai un peu du mal à voir le rapport avec “mort suite à l’intervention de la police.” C’est juste un connard qui était ivre au volant, et qui travaillais comme policier. Clairement la famille dénonce un problème de corporatisme, ils ont surement raison, mais le corporatisme c’est pas que dans la police.
J’ai l’impression que les nombres ont été un peu poussés.
mullvad for movies, and spotify for music.
The issue with streaming companies is the exclusivity. I would happily pay for Netfix if I could watch Ted Lasso (= Apple+) and Halo (= Paramount+) on it.
But if you want access to original series you have to buy the platform. I pay around €45 total in VPNs, Seedboxes, Usenet indexers… per month. I would happily pay for Netfix if I had access to everything in the world for up to €50/month. But with netflix you get access to a shitty catalogue on only one device for €8/month… That’s not okay for me.
Call me an old man. But I like when things are stable. I don’t like starting my computer, and the software was updated to a new version, and some features disappeared or changed in behavior. This is why I hate the web where people update software right under my nose! With no control from my side.
Have ever checked if you checked how maintained are the dependencies/libraries of your favorite software? It’s a nightmare as well. The distro is not making anything worse.
First, the work is not often duplicated. The first maintainer to package will usually upstream patches which make packaging easy. Packagers will look how other distros packagers packaged the app they’re trying to package.
Also the duplication only happen a few time. Ubuntu just pulled almost all of their packages from Debian Sid. Same with RHEL/CentOS and Fedora. And so on, and so on
Also you’re overestimating how hard packaging is, most of the time, it’s scripted. (golang modules in debian, are imported in an almost fully automated way)
You know what distros bring?