They exempted iMessage because it’s not big in Europe. If it were as big as in the US it would’ve fallen under the DMA.
They exempted iMessage because it’s not big in Europe. If it were as big as in the US it would’ve fallen under the DMA.
What’s the difference between this and CBOR?
Yes I meant article 5 but did not remember the number 🙈🙈. Thanks!
Shame on Austria
Wouldn’t this invoke NATO against the UK and demand a lot of reparations?
The Danish and the Swedes putting aside their hate means that you messed up really big
To me it feels that if the planet cannot support life, then it’s not an Earth-like planet. So, the definition of Earth-like planet is broken
But if they had authentication you would know that the message doesn’t come from a legitimate satélite.
I never thought of that. That’s quite smart!
Most of the time comes disabled by default. You can easily change it but it’s a shame that it doesn’t come enabled by default
I thought that it was the carriers the ones hosting the RCS server. Is this not true?
Anyone good at insulting and ranting can make the cut. It should not be hard to train an AI on it.
For me the trick was to disable web search. I don’t remember how I did it but you can Google it. Then it was really nice and fast, as it should’ve always been
Spanish (aka Castilian) has one for every country.
Instead of trying to tackle the real issue: “why people park their bikes where they shouldn’t?”. They decide to tackle the symptom… That’s your average politician.
Well, what they use a lot in the Netherlands is a two floor bike rack. Something like this: https://images.app.goo.gl/7JBUFp6PnARhSKkX6
Indeed. Even though there’s a lot of bike racks. I feel that we need at least three times more. Also, many people have 2 or 3 bikes parked in different stations and other bikes get abandoned in the parking place. I think they should start checking that bikes are not parked in a spot more than 30 days.
How does it differ/compare to aac?
Quite an interesting read. When explained it seems obvious but this whole “weirdness” is introduced because there are two types of “noexcept”. The exception specifier and the exception checker. All because the committee doesn’t want to introduce new keywords (which I respect).
I was still waiting for them to enable it by default…