a significant amount of libs opposed the Iraq war because it was started by Bush Jr. If it was a Democrat they wouldn’t have been against it.
well 99.9% is a significant amount
Clinton’s NATO bombed the Chinese embassy 5 years before and not one peep
redemption moment
pretty sure some of our users are mods there, did that sub go lib anyway?
DEA handles scheduling and is in the DOJ I think?
First, a lot of ads work simply by raising awareness. These ads are essentially telling customers, “FYI, product X exists. Here’s how it works. It’s available if you need it.” Liquid Draino, for example, is a product that thrives on simple awareness, because drains don’t clog all that frequently, and if you don’t know what Liquid Draino is and what it does, you won’t think to use it. But this mechanism is pervasive. Almost every ad works, at least in part, by informing or reminding customers about a product. And if it makes a memorable impression, even better.
This is a hilarious example because the author has mashed up two different brands in their head and then uses the non-existent brand as their example for ads that make you aware of a product.
Overall it’s a meh post. High on vibes and assertions, low on sources and warrants for those assertions. Once I hit that passage it wasn’t worth it to me to finish reading.
lol gonna need you to post hog so that we can verify your account before you can post on this instance more, liberal
well they are right, the greens are pretty 
Vatican III but it’s doing away with the local-language mass in favor of Reddit-english because that’s the only language parishioners understand.
god I love this genre of post
just identical vibes to people in times past speculating on court intrigue like it meant anything
the controversy over the name
it’s funny because there was 0 controversy over the name. I didn’t see a single post opposed to changing the name
must’ve missed their apologetics for any celebrity accused of SA since woody allen