The plaintiffs said some of the regulations on Planned Parenthood centers were so strict, “most health centers or doctors’ office simply do not meet” them.

I suspect that’s entirely by design.

Reached the point of being more evil than Judge Frollo, congratulations.

I can’t decide if you’re trolling, or really committed to some kind of satire. I’m doubtful there’s any sincerity to what you’re saying, because you’re just making such empty statements. Why wouldn’t protecting interests and values have been important before, and how is Trump doing that with any of his actions?

party on the left

Very generous description of Starmer’s Labour!

I believe it’s known as a bussy.

Fair, but not reassuring.

Bold assumption that there’ll be midterms.

…what‽

What lies are being spread?

Okay, you’ve managed to convince me you’re trolling, so I’m going to leave it there. You do you boo.

Surely you can see why people would be sceptical of your claim? If I told everyone I have a talking dog, but whenever they ask for proof I tell them I don’t care to provide any, I wouldn’t expect them to believe me.

And yet you can’t produce any.

And justify it because he’s African American.

What do you imagine his intent could have been when twice performing a gesture that the majority of people will identify as a Nazi salute, other than him performing a Nazi salute?

Insurance generally, yes. But health insurance, no, especially when it could be funded by taxes like in other countries and still have that same element of shared risk, but without the perverse incentive to let people die just to create a little more profit for the precious shareholders.

Which I appreciate is what you said, but I thought it bore repeating. Other forms of insurance I suspect would be harder to nationalise, but in theory there’s no reason they couldn’t.

Very fair, I just saw an opportunity for the quote and couldn’t resist.

A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don’t do one.

He’d be lucky to just be fired.

And here I thought the official line was that he was there to record a podcast, and not to try and somehow buy Greenland for daddy. Or was that also fake news? Or was that fake news then but now real, because the other news that he’s trying to buy Greenland is now fake?

I’m struggling to follow your logic there.