AI will be intelligent one day in the future, but until now it only can give intelligent solution in certain tasks like AI used in science, medicine, physik, etc., but not to be confused with AI for the normal user, well, sometimes certainly more intelligent as the user. It can be a usefull tool, but only if the user also use his own brain.

Oh, sorry, I had the image since a lot of years. The world is small

01101001 00100000 01110100 01111001 01110000 01100101 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101101 01101101 01100101 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01101011 01100101 01111001 01100010 01101111 01100001 01110010 01100100 00100001

01001110 01101111 00100000 01110000 01110010 01101111 01100010 01101100 01100101 01101101 00101100 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100101 01100001 01110011 01111001

It’s for more confort

As I said, these things happen when the company uses AI mainly as a tool to obtain data from the user, leaving aside the reliability of its LLM, which allows it to practically collect data indiscriminately for its knowledge base. This is why ChatBots are generally discardable as a reliable source of information. Search assistants are different, like Andi, since they do not get their information from their own knowledge base, but in real time from the web, there it only depends on whether they know how to recognize the reliability of the information, which Andi does, contrasting several sources. This is why it offers the highest accuracy of all major AI, according to an independent benchmark.

A real Geek only need this one

The difference is easy, a ChatBot take informacion from a knowledge base scrapped from several previos inputs. Because of this much information isn’t in this base and in this case a ChatBot beginn to invent the answers using everything in its base. More if it is made by big companies which use it mainly as tool to obtain user datas and reliability only in second place. AI can be usefull in profesional use in research science, medicine, physic, etc. with specializied LLM, but as general chat for a normal user its a scam. It’s a wrong approach to AI in the general use, the Google AI proved it.

I use an AI as main search (Andisearch) because it is made as search assistant, not as ChatBot. In its base is only enough information to “understand” your question and search the concept in reliable sources in real time from the web. Because of this it’s accuracy is way better than those from every ChatBot from Google, M$ or others. It don’t invent nothing, if it don’t know the answer, offers a normal web search, apart it’s one of the most private search, anonymous, no logs, no tracking, no cookies, random proxie and Videos in the search result sandboxed. Not very known, despite it was the first one using AI, long before the others, from a small startup with 2 Devs, I use it since almost 2 years. Until now I found nothing better or more usefull for the daily use with AI https://andisearch.com/ PP

Screenshot of the original chat in Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1gq4acr/gemini_told_my_brother_to_die_threatening/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/537908/deceased-organ-donor-rate-in-europe/

Most organ donnors are in Spain (Opt - In)

The title of the threat is valid for all following years

https://bearblog.dev/

I use Proton services (among others) since years and i think that they are pretty trustworth with stable services and fair conditions.

For a long time I have disconnected my TV from WiFi, I watch the news in the morning and watch movies on the official website of public TV or on Pluto TV on the computer or via Bluetooth on TV for free and without ads. It has been clear to me for a long time that the prefix “smart…” on electronic devices is synonymous with “spy…”.

You can, every product of a company which are not profit centered apart being OpenSource, by definition is way more trustworth than proprietary soft of big US companies. Proton services made it’s fame because of its known reliability since a lot of years.

• https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-browser-open-source/
• https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/66089/why-isn-t-vivaldi-browser-open-source

Yes, Vivaldi isn’t fullFOSS, because 5% of the script of the unique UI is proprietary of Vivaldi, but it’s 100% auditable and even moddeable by the user, they even show how to do it in its community. Edge and Chrome would fork it in the same moment when Vivaldi make it OpenSource, killing all other Chromium and Vivaldi itself. Maybe in the future it will go full OpenSource, there are still intern debates about it. The sense of OpenSource is to be capable to collaborate in new products, but with almost 100 browsers and forks in the market, this value is pretty debatable. For the user is more important the ethics of the company respect the user, in this case a european, employee-owned cooperative, which is given with a full transparency in all it’s services included in the account (mail, calendar, feed, blog, the Vivaldi Mastodon instance, e2ee sync in own server, etc.).

Vivaldi, good maintaned, no calls to Google, inbuild and customizable ad and trackerblocker. If Chromium, than this one.