Except the political persecutions continyally escalate REGARDLESS of violent political actions. Tell me, how many political murder of this calibre have there been in the last 20 years in the “civilized” or rather colonized global North?
You are extremely dishonest in interpreting the message from the one user who is excercising way too much patience with you. You should wash your mouth when you speak about MLK when spouting for your moralism.
Also, unfriendly tip: if you’re gonna critizice people for being condescending to you, you shouldn’t start your argument being condescending towards everyone a priori.
Finally, you have no moral high ground, your “non violence” apparently only applies to popular opinion and not state or politicians actions. Also, citing the French revolution as an example is woefully reductive and shows that maybe you should dust off your degree and read just a bit more.
Moralism did not best fascism
Do you really want mass appeal right now? Just be patient, build good information and ppl will come
That would just make the molepeople mad and double our problems
I think all your criticisms are valid, but I sense a generalized vitriol born from disappointment of specific entities or people, while you’re criticizing what’s possibly the first “big” political for many of those people, and you risk of alienating everyone potentially capable or willing to do more by talking this way. No political community is sustainable if there cannot be clemency for the inadequate actions of ignorant people.
Accountability is important, criticism is important, but self criticism and self accountability are the most important of all.
Acting high and mighty towards the “less politically pure” than you will not pressure anyone into doing more, you might not like to hear it, but to many what you wrote can be equally seen as virtue signalling.
I write this with no animosity, just trying to form a constructive criticism for your justified frustration
Curious abt this too
Do you actually have an idea, or are your just minimizing stuff you don’t agree with?
Why are your so angry with the people you are supposed to convince to join you? Or are your just trying to cyinically convince everyone that nothing is possible by criticizing everything that isn’t a molotov?
It’s everyday my pal
Your point is based on an idealistic and wishful “uncorruot government”. You cannot have an uncorrupt government. What’s needed is a different form of political decision making, one where the common folk participates in the political questions, not just some answers, where accountability is protected and a priority.
I don’t know the exact blueprint for this, maybe it is as unattainable as an “uncorrupted government”. What I know is that nobody really tried it yet, while so called “liberal democracy” has proven its failings to all and the fascist have been taking advantage of those failings since the start. The only way yo avoid this is to change our questions, not to all agree on the answers
That’s not what happens in nature
Don’t be sorry, your comment was helpful to me, thank you
Well i was talking about ritalin and equasym actually
To me they only made me incredibly nervous or incredibly sad, i think I might have been misdiagnosed and I’m actually autistic maybe
Yeah I understand, and I like the decision, i hope my sentence example was of help
Generally with animals the “it” pronoun fits best, but i think they phrase itself need reworking, i understand that you can’t today say but i think it’s a difficult way toc phrase it the way toc wrote it.
Maybe “this is the monkey I suspect is seeing my ears”
Running on borrowed time like capitalism always did
Guerrilla tactics work, no one is ever gonna just randomly storm the capitals, that’s just kind of naive and reductive
They patriarchy erased most matriarchal myth and cultures during the dawn of sedentarism