Foucalt would probably be opinionated on this.
Foucalt would probably be opinionated on this.
Well so is torture
There are four lights! 💡💡💡💡
It feels like a potential security nightmare. If your desktop at work is compromised and you have your domain admin come over and take a look; they might decide not to elevate the whole session, exercising appropriate caution and protocol in doing so, but just wing it with a quick sudo !! because the previous command didn’t go through.
I don’t quite remember if this works properly, but I think !! should expand to sudo “previous command” at least in bash.
Elon Musk. Now please shoot me. I want it too.
Best comment I read in a long time ❤️
Workers unaware of class struggle
I got milk so I’m human and must die.
I want the bass sex 🎼🔊💦
Maybe I remember it wrong, been a while since I had contact with the insurance industry.
Also might depend on national insurance regulations.
I assume you’re right since you are in the sector, but I don’t know where I picked up the notion, that reinsurers would reinsure themselves.
I was quite surprised when I first learned it, there are insurance companies which specialize in selling insurance to insurance companies in case the insurances they sold have to be paid. See Reinsurance on Wikipedia for example.
Obviously Reinsurance companies might reinsure their claims to other Reinsurance companies until nobody knows who is actually paying.
Similar to packing rotting investments with other investments and selling them to retirement founds, because hey look, there are good investments in it.
deleted by creator
Would you be so kind as to point out the straw man in that?
And no I don’t think you are necessarily wrong, I think you apply your standards selectively.
Moving the goalpost fallacy. You wrote in your comment to which I replied that no argument can be made against pointing out that someone’s arguments contains fallacies, which is not true.
I wasn’t present as you got hurt arguing on the Internet so I couldn’t anticipate that you were up against someone who’s “entire identity was based on logical fallacies” (ad hominem).
I mean don’t you prove his point, by pointing out that all governments that call themselves communist are “so called communist governments”? So they aren’t doing communism right, else they could call themselves rightfully communist.
I do share the notion that communism is an ideology or economic system that is supposed to liberate people from class war. So it should be a liberating force. Suppressing dissent, free media, and casually engaging in imperialism and ethnic cleansing is not what I’d imagine a liberating government would do.
Obviously democracies with “free markets” also have these pitfalls. Not to say that both are equally wrong, but both are surely not the implementation of its self proclaimed ideals.
Fallacy fallacy: only because it contains a fallacy (or a bunch) the argument isn’t necessarily void.
Still stacking fallacies isn’t usually a sign of a good and or valid argument.
Holy Lilith it’s gonna be so awkward when the Europeans have to make invasion plans together with the Chinese because Trump is Blitzkrieg-ing through America.
A bullpub revolver would eliminate at least horrible antifeature of bullpub designs, it doesn’t eject hot cartridges into your face.
Tastes like mobile screen. 🫠