• 421 Posts
  • 1K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle

  • By the inclusion of transport workers, i’m guessing train workers in particular, i’m guessing they’re talking NSW Labor.

    I don’t know what pay is like for these people over East, but if its anything like here, Nurses and Train workers are paid fairly well. What I meanbto say is they’re able to live firmly middle class lifestyles on their incomes.

    To fix the crises in cost of living and housing we really want to be targeting the lower end band of wages, and increasing costs on housing investments like tax discounts and exemptions; at the same time some of these tax discounts apply to assets in general, those should stay, to promote the conversion of investment in property (all types), to more productive assets (ASX, private enterprises, Super, the list is endless). By doing this we’ll begin gaving a pool of money aiming for diverse growth investments, thereby helping the economy to diversify theough private capital flows.

    Government of course can help direct these private capital flows by crowding in with Government resources (grants, exemptions, lending,etc) on those industries and companies that align with national targets, such as building feckin submarines, or whatever the shit the Government of the day wants.

    Bit of rant, sorry. Reading Mariana Mazzucato again.


  • Yep, this is true. It comes down to the media in this country.

    Which makes me pose the question, where the fuck are Labor and the unions on opening or supporting friendly media?

    Like, sure the super industry have the New Daily for what thats worth, but arguably Turnbull has done more for media balance in this country than anyone on the “Left” has by being friendly to Guardian coming over here.

    The idea that Murdoch still has a lock on country broadcasting along with ABC, after three years of Labor is laughable. They should have been white anting that gift of a contract since day one.


  • Ugh, this feels just like the Voice polling a slow moving car crash.

    Will Albanese ever show he’s a PM for Australia, and not just a political manager?

    I suppose its not surprising the only strategy thats worked in the last few years is small target.

    Maybe villainise Dutton, go after him with everything, full negative campaign, make it about Dutton. The guy is dislikeable bash it every chance they get,

    Q - What is your plan for this,

    A - Our plan is in our policy documents, but wheres Dutton? What’s this grand plan he promises?

    Instant pivots to Dutton, link him to Rinehardt, and Palmer everytime mining or wealth inequality, or housing is brought up.




  • The PM has been on the phone this week putting Australia’s case to gain an exemption from US tariffs on alluminium and steel.

    A key talking point was the fact that we need good supply of these for our airline industry.

    Oh, and btw this incident involving an Australian surveillance plane just occurred with China.

    Whether its a bit of good luck, or Australia and China nodding at each other about US tariffs. Or whether it Australia acting of its own accord.

    This has now become a billboard demonstration for the US executive of why Australia must maintain these industries.

    side note:

    • Does OP ever post anything but negative stories about China? If this is the case, should we be engaging with their posts?





  • Hmm, maybe.

    I always found the british are more cynical, which makes it seem like they have less trust. But when you observe their behaviour i think they’re more trusting of institutions, than the Americans.

    I think an interesting example of Britain’s trust in their Government is all the Leave voters thinking the Boris Johnson, Farage types actually had a plan for brexit, beyond corruption. I think thats evident in the amount of leave voters who have switched their own assessments.

    Comparing that to the US theres no signs of changes to population divisions or sentiments about the other side or Government. Of course all sides have truths to point to, where resolutions to those truths aren’t delivered, which doesn’t help any healing or moving on prospects.

    I’ve found Americans can be super positive people about all kinds, but its almost a social sin to speak well of government services. Of course, i’m speaking in the broadest possible terms here, i can think of a friend in NY who undermines this argument a little.

    Doesn’t help the UK have one of the most aggressive medias in the world. They’ll oerblow a straight banana, if they could… oh… wait…



  • Well, i’m surprised i thought being Western Australian administered, the WA Government held most of the sway over decisions on/about cocos/keeling.

    I understand but am also interested that they vote with NT. Thats an interesting and understandable decision the AEC (probably) have made.

    But this is the issue, that now spreads these people over a State, a Territory, and Federal. The people there have every right to be angry about this situation. No matter what happens to their islands, we need to incorporate this place into a single State or Territory and have them acting a proper Shire.






  • So, my point is a question about whether employees hiding behind the ‘corporate veil’ of legal protection who have taken actions to the detriment of others aren’t held to account the same way they should be, if they had taken those actions in their personal lives.

    Workers who take positive actions, or what could loosely be described as not negative in the aggregate, in their professional lives are often, not always, recognised for their actions in the form of pay, bonuses, time off, promotions, public endorsements such as local business awards and more.

    While the positive work they have performed for a company is retained and owned by the company, the reputation and rewards for that work go with them personally.

    What i’m questioning is whether the protection of the corporate veil has gone so far that the approbium for negative actions isn’t attached to individuals personally. And whether that is a detriment to our society.

    IT could work as an example, in the privacy space. There have been some questionable ethical actions there. Problem is, as you rightly say the massive changes, largely positive, to our society by IT has sort of swamped these negative actions for the majority of people.