CloutAtlas [he/him]

  • 56 Posts
  • 1.71K Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 17th, 2020

help-circle




  • Honestly didn’t know the etymology coming from an unhinged weirdo, but I’ve generally used it (irl mind you, I’m in China) as a handwaive when family asks about why X in the west is bad/inefficient/non-existent and “right wingers” isn’t the cause.

    Like what’s with the aversion to nuclear power? Combination of 白左 and also the fossil fuel lobby.

    Or if a policy that does (ostensibly) benefit poor people but is means tested to death, and they ask why it’s set up like that. 白左

    But I don’t really often hear it in China. My family is just weirdly politically engaged due to being former Party members and revolutionaries. The average guy in the street is absolutely not going to use the phrase ever.

    Yeah sure weirdos on XHS will also use it to refer to any aspect of the Western “left” they see online that they disagree with, but it’s wholly inconsistent. Could be addressing Ultras. Or trots. Or liberals. Or redditors. Or nazbols. Or socdems. Or demsocs. I feel like XHS comment sections are like 2 steps away from calling Shanghai 白左.



  • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.nettofood@hexbear.netRepost
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    Telling my family here in China of what the western diet is is always fun.

    “So the working class would often go to a petrol station, known as a “servo” to the locals, and purchase something called a “sausage roll”, which is sausage mince wrapped in high fat pastry.”

    “As the whole lunch? There are no other dishes?”

    “No, it’s basically entirely unseasoned except for a small amount of salt. It is often paired with a miniscule amount of tomato sauce, though. They would then also drink a sweetened iced coffee or a soda. The Anglo Australian has meat consumption rates rivaling that of a Mongol, but with a fraction of the exercise or excuse”







  • I’ve posted this before but

    Ray Bradbury has come out to say Farenheit 451 is actually about the dangers of TV addiction. On multiple occasions.

    There’s a time where he gave a lecture at UCLA and a student insisted to Bradbury’s face that he was wrong about the book he wrote and so Bradbury walked out. Death of the author, yada yada yada.

    The moral of the story is that TV is going to kill literature and turn people into smooth brained zombies who can’t/won’t accept the higher medium of the written word, so they made it illegal.