They are now at the point of calling me a disgusting person who doesn’t belong in civilized society because I am against the production, and use, of child pornography.

Give me a million attempts and I would never have guessed that is the person I would encounter today. haha

The only people who defend child pornography this hard are pedophiles, and I am not going to continue to argue with a pedophile.

I hope you get the help you desperately need before it is too late.

Victimless crimes are not crimes. Thus producing any pornography is a crime only when it involves violating someone’s rights.

You mean like when someone takes a photo of a minor, removes their clothing to make a sexually explicit image, and uses that image to harass, bully, and extort?

Ah, so you are dumb enough to think it’s bad to defend pedophiles who have not committed a crime against a real person?

Taking a picture of a minor, making that image sexually explicit, and using it to harass, bully, and extort that minor is not a “crime against a real person”?

Damn right, I am defending pedophiles who are being persecuted for being born with that deviation alone. I am also defending pedophiles who satisfy that via any means not harming real people. I will do both till my last breath.

You should stop “defending” their “right” to child pornography and start advocating for them to get real help with the very serious mental disorder that causes them to want sexual activity with a minor instead.

If you argument is that they are disgusting and you don’t want them in society, then so are you.

My argument is that they should not be given child pornography. Your argument is that they should.

The disgusting people I don’t want in society are people who use child pornography, and those who defend their use of child pornography.

Kindly see yourself out and take the rest with you.

How about you crawl back under your bridge instead?

What this conversation is about has as much to do with child pornography as hentai with loli characters.

Creating sexually explicit images of minors is child pornography.

You just can’t argue without unsubstantiated accusations, can you?

You literally confirmed my claim in your first sentence, and your last.

When real living people are being murdered and abused in droves, you are still worried more about glorified automated Photoshop and accusing its users of being the same as actual rapists.

Production of child pornography is production of child pornography. It does not need to involve rape. Producing child pornography is a separate crime.

Its users are pedophiles because they are producing child pornography. You are defending them.

These are the facts.

This type of leadership is not likely to change after an election win.

We know exactly how Pierre plans to run the country because we already had Harper as PM. It will be the same if Pierre becomes PM.

There really isn’t a solid strategy against what the Conservatives are doing outside of passing legislation that helps the problems they keep parroting and communicating what is happening clearly to the population.

One half of the strategy is being blocked by the Conservatives in the house as they tie up proceedings with privilege debates, and the other half is a serious weak spot with the Liberals in general as they don’t seem to know how to communicate effectively.

We will see how effective the strategy Conservatives are using post federal election because as it stands we cannot really say it is effective when the Conservatives are the only party campaigning making polling numbers lean dramatically one way.

It may not be an identical scenario but I still think it would be fair to say that an AI generated image is not as damaging as a real one.

“The deepfakes are often used to extort, harass or bully minors, she says, and are easy to make because of the many sites and apps that will “nudify” an image.”

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/deepfake-minors-porn-explicit-images-1.7385099

I wasn’t even supposed to be here today.

It is weird how hard you have been defending the production of child pornography in this thread.

Is that supposed to be an insult?

Try saying something meaningful next time so you don’t feel the need to spam my inbox 4 day old troll.

This isn’t killing the problem at the root.

The root of the problem is a complete lack of care for people with addictions and mental health issues. No amount of regulation will help the root when it does not involve increase addictions and mental health care spaces.

I am going to assume you like the smell of your own farts, based on the condescending tone of your comment, and are not aware that people still start smoking without advertisements for cigarettes.

When did I say it was controversial? When did I say I didn’t agree?

The sexiest.

I agree weekends were a mistake.

It should have always been 2 on 1 off, 2 on 2 off.

While I appreciate the sentiment, I am sorry to say “Fuck the police 101” is down the hall.

Jesus Christ my guy we get it.

Now can you stop spamming this bullshit everywhere you can?

Chrome is now owned by a company, owned by a company, owned by another company, that is owned by Google.

I’d like to be able to agree that nobody enjoys having their words twisted to suit others’ agendas.

What does this have to do with the topic of adding conjecture needlessly to conversations?

Mostly I’m frustrated here because I’m advocating for the victim.

No you aren’t.

Yeah, teenagers just up and die and end up in ovens all the time, nothing weird about that at all /s

Maybe there’s details that aren’t being shared, and I suppose you can’t really rule out an industrial accident, but HMMMMM

This is not “advocating for the victim”. This is non sense that adds absolutely nothing to the conversation.

The truth is we’ll never know what happened because none of us were there.

At least you finally understand what I have been saying.

I’ve left this discussion with the feeling that you’re calling me racist and am out here trying to cause distress for the family. It’s just so far off that mark that it goes beyond the pale.

Allow me to confirm your feelings.

I am calling you a racist and saying your actions cause distress to victims. Because you are and they do.

I hope your day gets better.

What makes you think it isn’t going good? Do you believe that some random with an ignorant opinion on a situation has the ability to destroy my whole day?

The ego on you is impressive. Unwarranted, but impressive.

You betcha. Exploitation is equal opportunity.

Sure, I guess I’m just deeply suspicious when a young minority dies while working at a Walmart and police rule out foul play without further comment

What made you feel the need to point out the victim being a minority, and telling the world how deeply suspicious you are because of that, in your original comment if ethnic background doesn’t matter to you?

Now who’s adding conjecture?

“Opinion or judgment based on inconclusive or incomplete evidence; guesswork.”

Not me. Especially when the whole sentence remains in context.

Cause of death seems pretty apparent coupled with the lack of evidence demonstrating foul play. Plenty to go on that leads to more reasonable conclusions outside of foul play.

Notice how I said the cause of death is apparent, and didn’t try to speculate on what it could be even though the most likely cause is asphyxiation from being stuck in an oven that has been turned on.

Facts are someone died in an oven, and there is no evidence of foul play. Your morbid need to know more than that while not being personally connected to the family is a sickness.

We’re obviously not going to agree on this

What exactly do you want me to agree with you on?