• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    There absolutely is benefit, though. First of all, I’m anti-market anyways, the profit motive is terrible and needs to be done away with, so that’s my internal bias.

    With my bias out of the way, Market Socialists gain a lot by stating they are Socialists because that very idea seems foreign to Liberals. If they hear Socialism and think mega-communism 100 gorgonzillian dead, then hear markets attached to that, that very term challenges and destabilizes their preconceived notions.

    • J Lou@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why is the profit motive terrible in your view? What should we replace the profit motive with?

      What is the benefit to pro-market anti-capitalists to challenging that particular preconceived notion? It creates an unnecessary roadblock when pro-market anti-capitalists can just describe themselves as radically democratic liberals, who want to extend democracy into the workplace @memes

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Incentivizing profit instead of outcome results in power imbalances and enshittification. What was once disruption becomes scientifically engineered to extract as much money from the users as possible.

        • J Lou@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The only way incentives based on outcome work is when people produce directly for their own use. For cases where people produce for others, the profit motive helps coordinate people to produce. Power imbalances can be avoided by collectivizing means of production across multiple coops.

          Enshittification requires IP monopolies. Economic democracy shouldn’t have IP monopolies. Instead, it should secure software freedom. Digital public goods should be funded through quadratic funding @memes

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Citation needed. Profit doesn’t incentivize working for others, it incentivizes extraction from others. There’s still a power imbalance between customer and provider in a market.

            Enshittification happens regardless of IP, it’s a result of competition. Over time, people find new ways to extract more from their customers.

            • J Lou@mastodon.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Whether there is a power imbalance between customer and provider is dependent on how competitive the market is. When providers have market power, consumers can form associations to collectively bargain down providers’ prices.

              Is there an enshittification example without IP?
              Enshittification usually happens with monopolistic firms not competitive markets.

              What would you replace markets with specifically?

              Quadratic funding lets public goods be free. I can’t see how it’s extractive @memes