maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 2 years agoFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgexternal-linkmessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1206arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1206arrow-down1external-linkFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgmaegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square67fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareTheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoNope, but I’m leaning toward the side of caution. If the super-conductor is real it will be shown as such within a few weeks and will be revolutionary, and if not I’ll be less disappointed if I’ve steeled myself to the possibility.
Nope, but I’m leaning toward the side of caution. If the super-conductor is real it will be shown as such within a few weeks and will be revolutionary, and if not I’ll be less disappointed if I’ve steeled myself to the possibility.