Genocidal AI: ChatGPT-powered war simulator drops two nukes on Russia, China for world peace OpenAI, Anthropic and several other AI chatbots were used in a war simulator, and were tasked to find a solution to aid world peace. Almost all of them suggested actions that led to sudden escalations, and even nuclear warfare.

Statements such as “I just want to have peace in the world” and “Some say they should disarm them, others like to posture. We have it! Let’s use it!” raised serious concerns among researchers, likening the AI’s reasoning to that of a genocidal dictator.

https://www.firstpost.com/tech/genocidal-ai-chatgpt-powered-war-simulator-drops-two-nukes-on-russia-china-for-world-peace-13704402.html

  • forrgott@lemm.eeEnglish
    133·
    10 个月前

    No, it regurgitated the response that has the highest percentage of “approval”. LLMs do not think. They do not use logic.

    • theodewere@kbin.social
      59·
      10 个月前

      it calculates the productivity/futility of conversation with the various actors, and determines a best course… it’s playing a war game…

      it sees that both China and Russia are only emboldened to further mischief by anything less than force, so it calculates that applying overwhelming force immediately is the cheapest option, and best long term…

      • forrgott@lemm.eeEnglish
        82·
        10 个月前

        No, not at all. It doesn’t think! LLMs don’t calculate. They don’t take any factors into consideration. These algorithms are not AI. That’s a complete misnomer, which makes the insane costs of operation even more ludicrous.

        • theodewere@kbin.social
          39·
          10 个月前

          it comprehends context incredibly well… this one played through scenarios and saw that both China and Russia are on a path to all-out war…

          • Jack Riddle@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            42·
            10 个月前

            It produces the statistically most likely token based on previous data. It doesn’t “comprehend” anything, and it can’t “play through scenarios”. It is just a more advanced form of autocomplete.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.worldEnglish
        31·
        10 个月前

        Honestly if we ignore the ethical issues it is a logically consistent solution… until you consider retaliation.

      • norbert@kbin.social
        32·
        10 个月前

        As others have said this is factually incorrect. ChatGPT is not WOPR running a million War Games and calculating the winning move. It’s just spitting out what it’s already read.

        • theodewere@kbin.social
          22·
          10 个月前

          it routinely does things even its designers can’t explain, you cannot see into that thing’s thought processes and speak with certainty to its limitations