ByteWizard@lemm.ee to Conservative@lemm.ee · 1 year agoConservatives vouching for Trump even more after knowing he “banned” Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years agowww.msn.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down142
arrow-up1-36arrow-down1external-linkConservatives vouching for Trump even more after knowing he “banned” Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years agowww.msn.comByteWizard@lemm.ee to Conservative@lemm.ee · 1 year agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squarejimbolauski@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoIt was a funding bill not a bill making human trafficking illegal.
minus-squarejimbolauski@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoNot supporting a funding bill does not make someone pro human trafficking.
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eeMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoOften when bills are rejected it is because there is pork in there. The way to fund it is through normal law enforcement or by submitting a bill without the pork.
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eeMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoThat is because Democrat love to spend money they don’t have.
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eeMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoJust mirroring your equally worthless reply. You seem to think nobody was handling this issue before they put in a bill. If you had read the objections to the bill, you’d get why they voted against it.
It was a funding bill not a bill making human trafficking illegal.
deleted by creator
Not supporting a funding bill does not make someone pro human trafficking.
deleted by creator
Often when bills are rejected it is because there is pork in there. The way to fund it is through normal law enforcement or by submitting a bill without the pork.
deleted by creator
That is because Democrat love to spend money they don’t have.
deleted by creator
Just mirroring your equally worthless reply. You seem to think nobody was handling this issue before they put in a bill.
If you had read the objections to the bill, you’d get why they voted against it.