• SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Copied from another comment you didn’t read.

    No it’s bad precedent.

    Colorado barely had a majority on the decision, three other states ruled differently and Trump hasn’t been convicted of anything yet in Congress or in court.

    Do we want the pre-election period filled with both sides trying to disqualify the other side’s nominee just because they have a majority in their state’s Supreme Court?

      • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        His point was that Trump hasn’t been convicted yet. Even though he obviously invited an insurrection, legally he hasn’t until he’s convicted.

        If we set this precedent pretty soon Republicans will be flooding Democrats with bullshit “insurrection” allegations to get them off of ballots. If they have enough control in their state’s supreme Court they might even succeed.