• Vincent@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    the rules for the 100% shouldn’t be made because 10% can’t self regulate.

    Unfortunately that’s hard to avoid, because those 10% will disturb lessons and take up the teacher’s attention, thereby negatively affecting the other students.

    Are the teachers supposed to do extra work to ensure no teen had a cell phone?

    It’s way easier for a teacher to take away a phone that disturbs a lesson when there are not supposed to be phones in the first place, than have to argue about exceptions and limits to the rules every time.

    I agree and sympathise with your overall philosophy, but I’m also conscious of the practical limits, unfortunately.

    • Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay but in my school, they could already just take your phone if they wanted, their class their rules, no argument needed, but in the other school I went to it was like they were expected to.dig through kids backpacks and have them empty their pockets to find their phones they didn’t even have out

      • Vincent@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah the latter definitely sounds excessive. As for “no argument needed”, I can tell you that even if no argument is needed, that doesn’t mean that students won’t go for one :P