• Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    A world tour like that requires a shit ton of labor, sure it’s less straight forward to decide how much surplus value of that labor goes to her, but I would argue it’s certainly not negligible

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If she had to do everything by herself, the world tour would consist of a few one-woman-gigs at local bars.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like all things, there’s a middle ground. No, don’t do everything yourself, but give back proportionally. Swift is better than most in that regard, sure, but she can clearly give more if she’s encroaching on being with 10+ digits. This is the problem.

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That was exactly what I meant. I chose the “Taylor Swift does everything on her own” scenario to disprove the notion that she does all or most of the important work on a show.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just the handful of concerts I’ve been nominally involved in settin up… there’s hundreds of security staff. 20-50 semi trucks for the stage, a hundred or so roadies. Dozens of forklift drivers. Traffic direction.

      And that’s ignoring increases staffing/labor by cities and neighboring properties (increased cops, paramedics, increased security adjacent to the event…)

      Like.

      It’s far from negligible