• The US could have ended it 2 months ago, but instead it sends weapons and stops any international attempt at stopping it. It is complicit and all the resistance groups across the Middle East agree. US interests in the Middle East and military are legitimate targets. We can agree to disagree, but the US government will be held accountable for its war crimes.

    • ex10n@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      As any nation/organization should be. The US is not exempt from international law, but fortunately has a remarkably solid argument in defense of its actions here.

        • ex10n@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It would be naive to think the strength of a nation in international relations is not a waxing/waning manor. It’s of upmost importance to maintain policy that echos the opinions of a collective humanity.

            • ex10n@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not true, the US and Israel act independently. Their democratic elections alter policy over time as new elected officials foster youthful debate and thus change officials policy. It’s not a static system, but instead a dynamically evolving one.

              • Yet, the US is in complete lockstep defending Israel, regardless of which party voted in and regardless of which International law Israel is violating.

                Honest question, do you know that you are lying? The connection between US financial, military and political support and Israeli crimes against Palestinians is clear to the whole world.