• AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ummm… Why the variable timeline? I don’t really understand US politics, and I’m an American. I’ve no hope of really understanding the UK system… Still, how do you not just vote in a new government/PM/MPs on a set schedule? That’s the most not British thing I’ve ever heard of. I thought you guys love routines.

    • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have the same system in Australia. Constitution sets a maximum govt term but a parliamentary majority can call an election at any time before then.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, but why does the same party stay in power if a vote happens early? Seems like the conservatives have had control of England for the last 40-50 years, basically since Thatcher.

        • Dendie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Think back to the time George W. Bush was around and we had Tony Blair and Gordon Brown - both from the Labour Party

            • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              “New Labour” as it was branded under Blair, was basically a more right leaning Labour. Brown was Chancellor to Blair and took over after his resignation, much like everyone since Cameron (who himself was initially elected as leader of a coalition to a hung parliament).

        • Finerney@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So, voters elect Members of Parliament during general elections not a prime minister, the political party that wins the most seats in the House of Commons usually forms the government. Since we don’t elect the PM the king ‘invites’ the leader of the majority party to form a government since they’ll likely have the support of the majority portion of MPs, that person becomes the prime minister.

          This leads to the slightly unusual situation where the incumbent party can essentially decide to replace the prime minister at will, this is usually accomplished by either an internal party process (1922 committee for the Conservative Party) or if the prime minister decides to ‘resign’. The incumbent party can then elect a party leader using whatever process they like iirc, once they have chosen a leader the king asks that person to become prime minister.

          tl;dr the uk electorate don’t choose the prime minister directly, you elect a local MP, and the party leader of the majority party becomes PM so replacing the party leader replaces the prime minister.

          ETA: the government can call a general election early and have done in the past but it’s not always in their best interest if they think they’re going to lose

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks for the explanation. I assume this is the compromise that England arrived at sometime around the signing of The Magna Carta?