James Somerton was making $170,000 a year with nearly 6 million views and 267,000 subscribers on YouTube, until…

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    There was another aspect to this video, which was that when Somerset actually did try to write some of the material himself, it was complete garbage.

    For example, he completely plagiarized from a book about Disney, but then, he had to transition between one plagiarized book and a different plagiarized article, and in that transition, he presented some facts about Disney organizing gay events at their park, and it was all outright lies. Disney did not actually have any official LGBTQ events at their parks until far after that.

    There was a different YouTube video that came out the next day, from this musician who listed all of the outright lies that he discovered while watching Somerset’s channel.

    I think the plagiarism displayed by Somerset is atrocious, but personally, I find lying and spreading misinformation to be even worse.

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the Todd in the Shadows video was the nail in the coffin. He might’ve been able to slither back by saying he didn’t realize he was attributing incorrectly (like Internet Historian fans are screaming), but he can’t come back from outright lying the times he wasn’t plagiarizing.

    • TheActualDevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have no issue with the content provided, but I wanted to give a little constructive criticism on the structure of your writing. Real small. When you say,

      There was another aspect to this video, which was that when Somerset actually…

      When you say there is a thing, the reader is going to assume the next thing you write to be that thing. So you don’t need the “which is that.” You can just launch right into what you’re going to say, you already set it up. You basically said “I have a thing to say. The thing I have to say is this:”

      Everything else is informative and well presented. No other notes.

      • SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would you need a semicolon then or not?

        There was another aspect of the video; Somerset actually made up…

        • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh doesn’t really flow compared to the original. I would have to reread to understand.

          I’m all for omitting unnecessary words, but certain cliché connectors are so ubiquitous that they act as punctuation. You don’t notice them, but reading is less comfortable when they’re missing.

        • TheActualDevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know that you need a semicolon but you could definitely use one, and that would probably be the best way. Semicolons are for when two complete sentences are related. But they can still be formatted as two sentences, or even the same sentence with a comma. Many sentences contain parts that could be standalone sentences. But reading back over the original sentence again I would probably say it can just be rewritten to be more straightforward.

          “Another aspect to this video is that Somerset, when actually trying to write some of the material himself, produced complete garbage.”

          Mostly I’ve just been reading a lot of philosophy recently which tends to run on a long and complex sentence structure that’s unnecessary and could be a lot simpler, so this kind of thing has been at the front of my mind lately. That’s probably the only reason I even noticed in the first place.