A full year later, we have “yet” to break 76M again.

In this post here https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/381421, we discussed how the numbers are likely much higher than are currently reported. This heavily implicates Cede/DTCC because every quarter requires fraudulent reporting (well played SEC).

But how much higher? We’ve been at 75M for exactly 4 quarters now. Estimates at the previous pace would have us over 130M shares DRSd at this point.

This would mean there are very few shares actually left out there. Roughly only 26M left to DRS before they truly start to panic from the math-breaking number. The DTCC definitely fucked up by thinking we couldn’t buy the entire thing lol.

They warned you there would be FUD, this is it. Keep DRSing and eventually ComputerShare will stop selling to us like they said they would if there are no locates ;).

With that in mind, also don’t forget the $149T bullet swap that hits instantly on December 15th. Since they opened that particular short, the stock has seen a 390% increase along with a 430% rise in interest rates, do think they roll that shit over ;)?

I will leave with the same question: Why do you think Gamestop changed the wording from 03/22/2023 onward?

  • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.worldEnglish
    281·
    1 year ago

    In no way do I believe DRS numbers have stagnated for this long. There are either concerted efforts being made to hide the truth via legal jargon, or im a monkeys uncle

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      16·
      1 year ago

      Which is insanely bullish. If no numbers are posted, I will continue w/ the pace I have charted in the previous post. There is no reason for the DRS-rate to not have increased during this price fall. But I will keep the slope the same for my estimates going forward. As bearish as possible.

      Over 129M DRS’d, and the DTCC is still tryna fuck around like nobody will notice our ceiling is exactly at 1x the float piror to the 1/4 split.

      Me: “Oh, we can’t DRS more than 76M? That kinda looks like you took all of the shares during the split and shorted w/ them instead.”

      DTCC: “Uhhh, no, you actually all just stopped at the exact same time (76M DRSd), duh. Oh and you stopped 1 year ago. The posts you’ve seen since then are actually all fake. Also Citadel is definitely not short on GME, don’t even look into it.”

    • VolunTerry@monero.townEnglish
      6·
      1 year ago

      Price action has been weird and volatile again lately after a slow and steady grind down. Seems like something is brewing.

      • regolith@lemmy.whynotdrs.orgEnglish
        8·
        1 year ago

        the timing of the increase in volume corresponds to the Heat Lamp Theory’s conjecture, although there may have been other factors as well

    • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.worldEnglish
      72·
      1 year ago

      Something I’ve not seen anyone discuss… perhaps because it’s a very unpleasant thought.

      What if the flood of purple circle posts on reddit are fake? If a majority are posted by bad actors, then SHF pull shares they DRS’d, wouldn’t that leave the numbers static?

        • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          There was a time I would read the post history of everyone I saw posting a purple circle. Did it for a month and couldn’t see anything felt was dodgy, but that was a while ago…

          What checks does drsbot make to verify submissions? I deleted my account a while back as felt I was addicted to reddit. When I made a new one I couldn’t post on superstonk due to my acc being under a year old. I messaged the mods at 6 months to request approval and was reinstated early. So it’s not exactly Fort Knox over there!

        • regolith@lemmy.whynotdrs.orgEnglish
          7·
          1 year ago

          There was some hypothesizing a while back (on SS and before Lemmy) that the initial drop or flatlining of the DRS trendline was due to hedgies having initially DRSed and then un-DRSed them, but I don’t recall if that was ever generally agreed. This was about the time that the Heat Lamp Theory was introduced which seems to have more supporting evidence at this point.

      • VolunTerry@monero.townEnglish
        6·
        1 year ago

        Could be. Every day it seems more clear that most of what we are publicly provided or witness online and in media has been fabricated.

        • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.worldEnglish
          4·
          1 year ago

          I just viewed some profiles, some I can’t view without logging in due to being 18+. Most were 2 years, couple were 7+ years old.

          Kinda meaningless though as I can go buy an aged account for nefarious use right now if I wanted.

      • DiamondHansGruber@lemmy.whynotdrs.orgEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t been back there since the exodus; has there been a continuous flood of purple circles there while the DRS numbers themselves are stable?

        If so, is there an Occam’s Razor explanation that is simpler than crime?