• The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, who thought that giving drunk people explosives on a massive scale would be a good idea?

    Same ones that handed them guns as a right, speaking as a US Citizen I really hate that right.

    • Astro Mike@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not so much the right itself, just the batshit crazy interpretation of it and our collective gun fetish culture. The nutjobs zero in on the “shall not be infringed” part completely ignoring the “well regulated” part that comes before that. *sigh*

      • TheCraiggers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, the “well regulated” part is talking about the militia, not guns in general. Although I’m not a 17th century lawyer so maybe I’m reading it wrong.

      • HelixDab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Well regulated” means trained. Not governed by a central authority. Anyone that goes to a range to practice regularly would be considered “well related”.