• Sandurz@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All that for a relatively tiny bump? I thought it would be a lot more drastic

    • EnderOfGender@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the 13" macbook pro is no longer being made, so you can’t get this sustained performance in M3 and newer

    • justformygoodiphone@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s extra dumb because

      1. you are pulling significantly more power for a tiny performance bump, so less “power on time” for the same device

      2. that computer he’s trying to make exists and called MacBook Pro m2. Now MacBook Pro m3

      Why would they degrade the user experience for MacBook Air while increasing performance on LONG and intense applications, a case NOT expected by the MacBook Air customer and also step on the toes of MacBook Pro.

      This product is dumb and good thing it doesn’t exist lol.

      • stuck_lozenge@alien.top
        cake
        B
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You actually don’t know what you’re talking about, why are Apple fanatics so confidently ignorant. It’s performing BETTER because it has a higher thermal headroom and still runs cooler. You’re literally complimenting Apple for have poor thermals with your roundabout logic. Astonishing the mental gymnastics you’re pulling off.

        • zaviex@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s performing 5-7% better for 30% less battery life while a similarly priced, slightly more expensive 14 inch MacBook has much better cooling and better features with even more battery life. This doesn’t solve a problem it makes the air a worse product by lowering battery. The air is for nothing more than light work. I can’t imagine anyone who wants one of those would say “yes I’d rather have 30% less battery life for 5% more performance and 1 C cooler on the chassis”.