Shouldn’t the role be “advertised” to other people as well? Why is it following the Kim family line when that seems completely against ML thought?

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
    1·
    1 year ago

    In my view, it’s perfectly valid to criticize the fact that the Kim family has been in charge the whole time. However, I don’t think that’s at odds with having critical support for DPRK.

    • ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.ml
      1·
      1 year ago

      I couldn’t agree more, I’m not a fan of lifetime leaders or nepotism, but their contributions to a better Korea are admirable and inspiring

    • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      yeah I think disallowing immediate family (if not more) from holding public power is something every political system newer than “divine right of kings” should do. Hardly anyone whining about north korea gives a shit that the united states went bush - clinton - bush into another clinton being the presumptive candidate and our elections are probably less legitimate than the dprk.

      something something royal family something something usual decadence, two of them.