• indepndnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t actually know all that much about it, but the anarchists that I know are all about communities and mutual support and stuff. So I guess they think government is bad and communities supporting each other is good.

    Personally I wonder what they’d call it when a community gets really good at providing a particular type of support and they agree to pool their resources to efficiently provide said support to all members of the community.

    • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes yes and then they discover that managing that shared pool of resources is quite the job so they all decide on a few key people to take on the task with specific roles. I think we’re going somewhere with this!

      • onkyo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        So? Rotating certain roles in society is part of anarchist theory and common practice in anarchist organizations. Besides anarchists aren’t opposed to assigning certain roles or managing resources. The point is how you do it i.e by actual democratic means.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        But nobody is appointed any role for life or until a higher boss says so, this is the key difference. Also the decisions on that role are not done in a vacuum, they can’t give orders and expect anyone to blindly follow it and never question. They have to be aligned with what the community wants, and if the person doesn’t act accordingly anyone can step in.

          • trolololol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cooperatives do that. Hippie communities did it to some degree. Elected politicians swearing on representing the people who voted for them, in principle, should do the same thing.

            And you know what would be great? If the truly anarchist communities where this actually happened were left to their own devices instead of being interfered by big bad countries who are afraid of “communism”

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        managing that shared pool of resources is quite the job

        No, it really isn’t… people have done that for millenia.

        • WldFyre@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not for the population numbers of modern nations, though. Managing a little town is one thing, millions of people is another.

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not for the population numbers of modern nations, though.

            No-one is qualified to make decisions for that many people, Clyde - the limits of hierarchical power systems is pretty evident.

            Managing a little town is one thing, millions of people is another.

            Do you really think Biden himself decides which pothole in your street will be fixed today? Decentralizing power is not some arcane mystery.

    • Prunebutt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re basically describing a coop.

      The thing is that these resources could get withdrawn in case that community can’t won’t supply that support anymore.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Personally I wonder what they’d call it when a community gets really good at providing a particular type of support

      Most of them would say, “close enough.”