Summary

GitHub has officially launched its passkeys security feature into general availability, following a two-month beta testing period. Passkeys enable cloud-synced authentication using cryptographic key pairs, allowing users to sign in to websites and apps with their screen-lock PIN, biometrics, or a physical security key. This technology combines the security benefits of passwords and two-factor authentication (2FA) into a single step, simplifying secure access to online services. GitHub’s move aligns with industry efforts, including collaborations between major tech companies like Google, Apple, Microsoft, and the FIDO Alliance, to make passwordless logins a reality across devices, browsers, and operating systems. Passkeys are seen as a significant step in enhancing security in the software supply chain, a vital aspect of the cybersecurity landscape.

  • asudox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool and all but I won’t use them if I can’t store them offline locally on my device. I am not going to use Google’s passkey storage system.

    • Raisin8659@monyet.ccOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are two types of passkey. Syncable and device-bound. (see https://fidoalliance.org/passkeys/). Theoretically, the device-bound passkeys never leave the device and users don’t have any access to it except to use it for authentication. The syncable type will first and foremost be synced by the platforms themselves (Google, Microsoft, and Apple), but eventually the 3rd-party password managers will be allowed to be sync providers, but possibly only on newly-released OSes.

      As far as I know, the passkey implementations currently on Android and Windows are device-bound; they are not synced to the cloud.

    • TurboLag@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t used passkeys yet, but I would hope that you can have multiple keys per site, not just one. So, after going through some initial pain of setting up each individual device, it should be nice having local-only keys for each of them, which you could revoke at any time.

      Password managers are also adding support for passkeys, so you should be able to sync them if you so wish.

      • asudox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would use a U2F physical key to secure the password manager as securing the passkeys with a password sounds dumb. Passkeys are here to replace passwords as a more secure alternative. What’s the logic behind securing them behind the thing it is supposed to replace?