That’s all. Played Civ since IV and the boardgame-like nature of it meant that I’ve gotten a lot of friends and family into it as a means to experience video games in general.

Civ VII looks really bad, even if I haven’t played it myself. Systems upon systems that aren’t properly explained, that somehow feel both cluttered and less in-depth than previous entries. Three truncated games making up the segments of one larger game is lame, too. A bad solution to the problem of people burning out in the later eras.

Most of all, though, is the business model of it all. Civ already leaned into 4X DLC conventions which meant getting the whole package was an expensive endeavor, but at least, for example, Civ VI had just two major expansion packs. Civ VII is already drowning into microtransaction leader purchases.

And then there’s, just, the price. It’s obscene. Denuvo is devastating to see as it creates a lot of barriers to giving the thing a try. I don’t get excited for games any more, but Civ VII would have been one of them.

Anyone try it themselves? Anyone in love? Anyone feel like me?

  • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    It’s terrible, honestly. Cutting down to three ages was just a terrible choice. The leader swap thing is such a jarring disconnect from the previous games in the series. It could be good if they had managed it right.

    Also, fuck the English but not having them as a power is just weird.

    • ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also, fuck the English but not having them as a power is just weird.

      They are in as day 1 season pass dlc lol, its the worst aspects of ‘fuck you’ predatory fan gouging ive seen in a long time.