HSR🏴☠️@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-26 天前Entropy? Never heard of it.lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square157fedilinkarrow-up1467arrow-down163cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1404arrow-down1imageEntropy? Never heard of it.lemmy.dbzer0.comHSR🏴☠️@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-26 天前message-square157fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 天前Why does it have to be cheaper? Why not both?
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 天前Because if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees
minus-squareThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 天前And places trees don’t grow?
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 天前Try thinking for a second. Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere
Why does it have to be cheaper? Why not both?
Because if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees
And places trees don’t grow?
Try thinking for a second.
Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere