Note that it looks like the copy writers changed the headline to “Trump Dares The Courts To Stop Him” for brevity, but this opinion appears on the front page with the headline I put in the title: https://kbin.melroy.org/media/fc/27/fc27e0c7624e758a8ba71e9891453b7539167b9139dd753602dd8016f5a5bfce.png You can also see the long headline at https://archive.today/2025.02.13-135321/https://www.nytimes.com/ .
Edited the headline for “brevity”? One headline is a call to action, one headline is passive. Can’t risk starting a real movement now can we… even talking about it is to risky for the NYT
I don’t understand why they did it either. Copy writers can advise, but the journalists should be in charge of the headlines, not them.
“If?”
Yes…if, be complacent in their wording and the changes. Hold steady, don’t act yet…keep holding for every article that clearly states he’s ruining the country and disobeying all laws…keep holding and be complacent…hold…hold…
Aka fucking act now and ignore news, act now .
