• leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Imagine pulling up to a red light, checking your GPS for directions, and suddenly, the entire screen is hijacked by an ad. That’s the reality for some Stellantis owners. Instead of seamless functionality, drivers are now forced to manually close out of ads just to access basic vehicle functions.

    Oh HELLLLL no. I hope my 2012 Subaru will last until I’m either dead or too old to drive. I don’t even want to have these damn screens for the usual shit you have to do on them. I want to be able to do everything with physical controls, no eavesdropping, and no dependence on a fucking app or touchscreen to operate anything in my car! I will drive my car while wearing mittens! shakes fist

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Maybe we just throw an ad on the windshield… Like a little one… Off to the side?

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This is why you need government. This is why you need regulations.

    Corporations are evil pieces of shit that would have you watch ads without seatbelts and without air bags.

    They’d grind you and your entire family into a powder if it made them a few bucks.

    Fuck Jeep and their shitty tin cars.

    • BambiDiego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This is why we need government that isn’t in the pocket of corporations.

      We need something like lawmakers having to disclose their tax information annually. If you want to be in office and make millions you should be willing to put your morals on the review table.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      they would have you watch ads without seatbelts and without air bags.

      No, they would require you purchase these because their business can’t sell their products without them, but they’d make you pay a subscription for them to keep working, and when you stop paying the subscription, the car stops turning on until you pay your monthly airbag and seatbelt fee.

    • alcoholic_chipmunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      They’ll make it cheaper for awhile to justify it to the public and government and then slowly raise the price so that you’re paying full price AND watching ads.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This is why used cars are so dang expensive, it seems like automobile quality has been in a free fall since 2008. The end user experience gets worse while the price goes up.

    • jmf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Early 2000s jap cars are unkillable, surplus of parts, and are not tracker spyware nests. Great little things for sure. My 90s turboed volvo is a far more temperamental beast, but I cherish her quirks :)

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Right now my car is an 84. With a back up 86 truck. I used to have a 2011 subaru, but hit an prairie antelope with it. If I had my pick I think 1990-2008 Japanese cars are the sweet spot.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            30 minutes ago

            No, The issue is with conceptions of auto safety becoming a selling point. For example look at the single biggest invention in reducing crash fatality? You would think maybe airbags, seat belts or ABS brakes… But nope, collapsible steering columns. But we are now sold “death proof” SUVs that are not really safer, in some ways worse. The issue is that safety devices have a diminishing return but fear is a great selling point, I would say there are old things that are death traps (like square body chevys) and things like saabs that I would say are to this day built safer then new cars. If we look at the data for auto fatalities per capita we can see that car safety has not had some magical jump since the late 80s but a more expected gradual change.

            As a side note I do and have done a lot of driving and from what I have seen in the last 20 plus years is a slide into cars that are:

            • Top heavy (bigger is not safer)
            • Have little to no visibility (that then try to make up for with back up cameras)
            • Are built not to avoid crashing but to make crashing more comfortable
            • Have limited to no driving feed back and over reliance on things like traction control
            • Make driving on the same road with them more dangerous (just look at north american headlights)

            At the end of the day I would rather drive a car that I can see out of and has a degree of safety devices (seat belts, collapsible steering column, working brakes) then something that is built like a living room on low profile tires that I will at some point crash. Bonus points if it does not explode or catch fire easily (think pintos or teslas).

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That’s newer then I would go but yeah at least Honda seems to be behind on the complete shit curve.

  • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    They really do take 80s and 90s dystopian movies as inspiration. Almost funny how ridiculous unimaginatively evil that are.

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No, it’s considered distracted stopping. /s

      Same damn diffence in my book, fuck Jeep for that shit!

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I wonder how hard it would be to make an open source car brain that can be a drop-in replacement for the commercial ones?

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Hard, even stuff from 10 years ago have proaitary hardware across multiple “brains”.

        • Pixlbabble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I drive a 2006. I have physical buttons and a shifter where my hand can lean on. Its great. lol

  • maxalmonte14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    24 hours ago

    “You almost ran over a five year old with your oversized vehicle, thanks for breaking! This segment is brought to you thanks to BetterHelp…”

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      or better yet “You just ran over a single mother while missing her child! this segment brought to you by BetterHelp, you’re gonna need it!”

  • moseschrute@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Roku was experimenting with similar stuff so I refuse to connect my Roku tv to WiFi. Will never update it

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Ya, they’ve been getting bad press for a while now. Will never own one of those.

      • moseschrute@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        The TVs aren’t a bad value. Gotta get back the the jailbreaking days. If someone released a custom firmware for my Roku tv that made it dumb I would use it.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve known several Jeep owners over the last decade and those that weren’t buying it strictly for the ‘Jeep clout’ as an actual vehicle/daily driver had constant issues, while under warranty, and dealt with issues even trying to get said warranty work done. Like that wasn’t enough for me, on top of that I had a mechanic with his own shop that said he’d never touch another Jeep because of how horribly they are designed to work on. Anything from ease of access to work on the engine to bolts stripping out because they were overtorqued during assembly and made with shit metals that would sooner melt than come off in one piece. Now this? Yeah, hope they go bankrupt. This is just as bad as BMW and their ‘pay a subscription for seat warmers’ bullshit.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      dodge in general did not do well on realiability, Thing is they have neat engineering. So I loved the grand caravan but they killed it to try and get folks to pay toyota prices for their shit and its like no. You vehicles have to be ten grand cheaper so that you amoratize the repair bills.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The dodge caravan was my teenage car. I loved it. Big. Ugly. No one wanted to drive with me and that was perfect because they also would have tried smoking in the car and I’d have broken out in hives. I miss you, dodge caravan.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yeah its to bad they got rid of it and they did some things that ruined the pacifica that took its place. For people with limited mobility the seats are the perfect height where you don’t drop into them and you don’t have to climb up into them. Being able to stow all the seats and in more recent time the roof rack is just incredibly useful. Then all the basic minivan things are really great. sliding side doors, the rear window winglet things and then the rear hatch. urge to suddenly go camping just have to back it up to the firepit and you can roast marshmellows in the rain.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You know, I’ve got to give their marketing team props for managing to sell a vehicle with the engineering quality of a Saturn to people with more money than sense for a whole ass order of magnitude more than it’s worth. Game recognizes game.

      • acchariya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Its not marketing it’s that they extend credit to anyone who comes through the door. 550 credit score? No problem sir, here is your $62500 RAM 1500, loaded with options. If you can’t pay $1000/month for a Kia why not splurge and not pay $2000/month for an optioned out truck?

    • pahlimur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah I’ve never heard anything good about jeeps in general. Now they are being run further into the ground by trying to become a luxury brand. At least when it was just a shitty jeep, it was still a somewhat cheap shitty jeep.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        When I was young, you (supposedly) could still buy WWII-era original Jeeps disassembled and packed into crates in cosmoline. I always wanted one of those but never had any desire to own a modern one.