i just dont see how you can say that the US is great for queer people when the US does less than nothing to support queer people (see AIDS). wouldnt it make more sense to say that queer spaces exist in spite of the us, instead of because of it?
the us is not great for queer people; i’m saying that its queer spaces are unique compared to those of the rest of the world and that it’s one of the few positive things that it has done and that it was done by accident.
i just dont see how you can say that the US is great for queer people when the US does less than nothing to support queer people (see AIDS). wouldnt it make more sense to say that queer spaces exist in spite of the us, instead of because of it?
the us is not great for queer people; i’m saying that its queer spaces are unique compared to those of the rest of the world and that it’s one of the few positive things that it has done and that it was done by accident.