Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez denied claims that she is secretly wealthy, stating she is worth less than $500,000 and doesn’t trade stocks or take corporate money.

Her financial disclosures show modest savings and student debt.

Some conservatives on X, despite opposing her politics, praised her perceived integrity.

Accusations of political corruption have surged online, partly fueled by Elon Musk.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Him running as a real leftest canidate after they tried to suppress him would have been the right thing, and him not choosing that path set us down the path we’re on today.

    There were a lot of Bernie voters who refused to vote for Hillary after that. The DNC lost the progressive vote for their actions in 2016.

    • moon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You mean him running as a third party candidate? That’s a guaranteed loss under the current electoral system. He would’ve siphoned votes from both sides, but more from Hillary and delivered Trump an electoral college and popular vote victory. The left would’ve been demonised even more than they already were and AOC/The Squad would never have been elected to congress in 2018. Under First Past the Post, the only option for a populist progressive candidate is to do what Trump did. Take the party over from inside out. Going third party is just a fantasy.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Yeah you’re right, he made the right choice bending the knee to the Neoliberals because then the Neoliberals wouldn’t have been able to beat Trump.

        Because Hillary beat Trump after the Neoliberals suppressed the Progressives in 2016, right? I forgot, can you remind me who won?

        • moon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          There was 0% chance a third party candidate was winning in 2016, Bernie or not. There was about a 50% chance of Hillary winning.

          Also, viewing this as ‘bending the knee’ is so juvenile. Bernie knows who he is and has advocated for progressive values for longer than most of us have been alive. He made a calculated decision to do what had the highest chance of defeating Trump. It’s not his fault that Hillary and the Democratic machine are completely inept

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Bernie had more individual donations from real people than any canidate in US history.

            It was the 2nd biggest grassroots campaign in my life after obama

            Sorry you didn’t pay attention

            • moon@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I’m well aware of how Bernie turned individual donations into a funding juggernaut. But if you think a third party candidate would win in a first past the post system, then you’re the one who’s not paying attention