• Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Time to found an llc based in Ireland to collect the monies as a proxy and then disburse them as “wages” for “consultancy”!

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Someone really needs to develop a way to transfer money without relying on banks. It’s insane that banks get this power to force their own morals on everyone, even when the affected transfers are completely legal

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Something that doesn’t toast the earth and isn’t completely taken by scammers and all sorts would be much preferable

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There’s plenty of proof of stake tokens that do not waste all that electricity that mining does

        • Artyom@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Almost every cryptocurrency other than bitcoin is far more efficient than bitcoin. Bitcoin went though a really weird hostile takeover by Binance, who realized that if they made Bitcoin super inefficient and gave it high transaction fees, then they could make a ton of money by pushing their alternative currencies and proprietary software. It was super effective, and they managed to keep the market centered around Bitcoin, and also make Bitcoin near useless as a peer-to-peer digital currency. Crypto miners will always spend the most effort on the most valuable currency, so we’ve ended up in a system that uses a ton of energy with at best marginal value to the users.

          Bitcoin Cash is the closest thing to the original goals of Bitcoin, and anything based on Etherium will be much more efficient since it’s based on proof-of-stake instead of proof-of-work.

        • admin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          XMR is very stable, and widely used but since is very privacy oriented and theres 0 need for KYC the techbros won’t ever talk about it, also is not profitable because the fees are very low, and the confirmations are almost instant, so major institutions likely will never endorse it. Monero for the win.

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 hours ago

            very stable

            We must have very different notions of what stability means. To me, anything that fluctuates more than 10% either up or down almost weekly is not stable.

            theres 0 need for KYC

            How does one exchange XMR for actual cash without going through an exchange company?

            • admin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              10% either up or down almost weekly

              For stability I mean something that won’t fluctuate more than 100% in a calendar year.

              How does one exchange XMR for actual cash without going through an exchange company?

              Up until not too long ago localmonero was a thing, but is been discontinued, and I have not been keeping up with something you could find in a google search.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    TL;DR Japanese institutions being disingenuous about being weird and regressive about sex.

    Again.

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s mostly just outdated laws that they’re have to comply with.

      There are plenty of talks regarding of it between politician themselves. Especially regarding censorship.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        The censorship thing is solidly the US’s fault (sorry) and a very different conversation than what’s happening here. Though I’m sure it has it’s roots in backwards '40s orientalism at some point, we were really good at exporting that.

        But like, from an outside person that interacts with japanese institutions in the ‘adult content’ sphere, they go way beyond what is mandated whenever anything international is involved. This article alone highlights how they won’t even say why they’re doing things, they’ll just vaguely blame it on nonspecific policy requirements and continue to restrict funds / obstruct shipping / deny visas / etc. It’s maddening to deal with.