• Waffle@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    4 days ago

    Exciting to see endeavoros making the list. I’m one of the 0.06%! There’s dozens of us!!

    • Bjornir@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It is really great, even with a NVIDIA. Never understood the complaints about arch, but maybe I have Endeavour to thank for that

      • Waffle@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Definitely about ease of use. After borking my system a few times it was just easier to go with endeavor.

    • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Can anyone comment on how difficult it is to get gaming working on vanilla arch vs endeavor or… Bazzite I think the other one is.

      I’m about to transition my main PC to Linux and I haven’t decided. I transitioned my laptop to vanilla arch and got everything working but it’s not a gaming laptop so that was the one thing I didn’t do. Worried it’ll be hard or impossible to get Nvidia card going and I’ll have to redo everything for one of the more prepared options.

      • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m on EndeavorOS, but I basically use Arch’s wiki for any troubleshooting/guidance. I wanted Arch with an easy installation and I got just that.

        No huge issues gaming-wise, but you do need to be comfortable referencing Arch wiki as needed regardless of your installation. My installation defaulted to the on-biard graphics processor instead of the gpu, so I had to install the proper stuff manually.

        If you need help in the future, feel free to reach out.