257m@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.dev · 1 year agoWhat are your programming hot takes?message-squaremessage-square895fedilinkarrow-up1350arrow-down114
arrow-up1336arrow-down1message-squareWhat are your programming hot takes?257m@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square895fedilink
minus-squarePatchworkHorse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoDoing this is a hot take, but “clean architecture” is a joke. My company is obsessed with it.
minus-squarescubbo@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI remember having a lot of doubts/criticisms of the book when I read it, but that was a long-ass time ago and I’ve forgotten it - what do you dislike?
minus-squareNoXzema@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI’ve seen it get a lot of hate revently. In my experience, it’s mostly been from people upset they had to refactor their 400 line function or write unit tests.
minus-squarePatchworkHorse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOff the top of my head… Too many layers of abstraction Multiple copies of the same model (entities, domain objects, models, DTOs, etc) Ours is a .NET6 solution, for what it’s worth. The solution itself has a few flaws, so that might be tainting my opinion a bit.
Doing this is a hot take, but “clean architecture” is a joke.
My company is obsessed with it.
I remember having a lot of doubts/criticisms of the book when I read it, but that was a long-ass time ago and I’ve forgotten it - what do you dislike?
I’ve seen it get a lot of hate revently. In my experience, it’s mostly been from people upset they had to refactor their 400 line function or write unit tests.
Off the top of my head…
Ours is a .NET6 solution, for what it’s worth. The solution itself has a few flaws, so that might be tainting my opinion a bit.