• 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yeah, surveillance steals value from consumers.

          Self-checkout seems better to me, because it decreases monotonous and forced public interaction (thus somewhat automated anyway): Beep. Beep. Beep. Do you want loyalty points? That’s 21.46€. Do you want the receipt? Goodbye! Beep. Beep. Beep…

          It uses less space.

          It is parallel instead of serial.

          The work is not much more than putting groceries on a checkout lane anyway, except for unlabelled fruits and vegetables.

          Self-checkout allows for smaller stores and coops, for example in villages or as kiosk.

          • redisdead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            Oh no, you had to answer two yes/no questions

            The worst inconvenience in the world.

            Parallel vs serial: there’s usually more than one check out lane open so idk what you waffling about.

            Less space is not a convenience for me so idgaf

            My local coop has regular check out lanes and it’s in a small town so idk what you waffling about.