• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Those trolls live off of engagement

    Not anymore. Back in the day trolling was a recreational activity done for fun. Deny the fun, cut off the troll’s food. Now it’s being done for political purposes, so cutting off the fun no longer functions since it no longer strikes at the primary motivation.

    • garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      The result for the people who block them is still the same, though: they no longer see the troll garbage.

    • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      It decreases the spread. Cutting form the engagement means free people who aren’t already subscribed to that content will see it, since there’s fewer people arguing with it. Which means those who are susceptible to falling for it have less chance to even encounter it, meaning fewer fall into it.

      Even if the incentive to create the trolls has changed, the counter to letting it spread hasn’t.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Depends on platform I suppose. Here, the level of activity is low enough that if you’re reading the comments, you’re usually reading all of them. In a major reddit sub that is seldom the case.

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          This was about bluesky/Twitter type social media. Things with reshare and follows to specific users, where someone you follow arguing with someone you don’t will expose you to the person you don’t follow.