Ignoring that my country doesn’t allow Idaho Stops, or that my Provincial Government wants to actively kill cyclists by removing safe cycling infrastructure, I’ve always wondered if there’s a reason why cyclists aren’t allowed to simply ride through an intersection like the one in the photo.

I’m talking about the right side, where the bike lane could extend through the intersection without interfering with other vehicles, including those that are turning left.

This would not only keep those stops safer (clears the cyclist out of the intersection), but would just make sense from a transportation efficiency standpoint.

Is there something I’m missing, or do cyclists have to stop only because motorists would take a tantrum if they weren’t required to?

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because you still need to yield for pedestrians.

    Stop signs aren’t just to control traffic but to make sure everyone takes the time to take in their surroundings and not make hasty decisions.

    If bikes could ride through without stopping, they may fly by a vehicle that’s stopped there and not see that it’s stopped to let a pedestrian cross the street and then it’s too late for the bike to stop before hitting them as they step out front in front of the truck.

    That’s at least one reason I can think of.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because you still need to yield for pedestrians.

      Of course. I’m not suggesting that you blow through the stop sign while other people are there! That’s not how an Idaho Stop works.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honestly most stop signs in rural areas and subdivisions should probably just be yield signs, for bikes and vehicles alike.

        The overuse of stop signs makes it so people get used to just doing rolling stops at the intersections where it’s 99.9999% safe to do so and then start doing them unconsciously at intersections where it really isn’t safe to

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Honestly most stop signs in rural areas

          We’re lucky enough (at least, until urban sprawl takes it away) to have some really nice rural routes around here.

          But I’ve come to some 4-way intersections where you’ll have two stop signs, and I can tell you with absolute certainty that it’s incredibly dangerous for cyclists to STOP at those signs.

          Cars and trucks travelling along the crossroad are usually going in excess of the speed limit, often times where there’s a hill so you can’t see them coming. A cyclist coming off a full stop may not clear the intersection safely.