• Zwiebel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is one detail wrong in the first post; that is not the lids speed but rather it’s minimum speed.

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately they got almost everything else wrong though. Mainly - the cover actually almost certainly just vaporiserd.

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Notice, children, how the common apostrophe from lid’s migrated all the way to its.

      Isn’t nature amazing?

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s assuming it crossed the image straight from edge to edge, though.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The cover obtained all of its energy from the blast, it can only go slower than its initial speed unless acted upon by another force.

      • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        No no, because they only had one frame of it moving, they can only calculate and upper and lower bound on it’s speed. The number given was the lower bound is what theyre saying.