• HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    Because the world isn’t “ending”. Yes climate change might bring famine, destructive weather events, or plague but in the meantime we are living in the safest, healthiest, and most technologically advanced era of humanity up until now, especially for those of us living in democracies. Most diseases that would have killed you a few hundred years ago have been solved, in general there are very few wars (compared to the constant on and off warfare in history anyway), and in most of the world slavery has been eradicated.

    Yes, there is societal divide (mostly due to economic difficulties and how social media influences people), yes there is bigotry and a rise in nationalism but much of this is only noticeable because of the media and the 24 hour news cycle. There has to be a constant issue hanging over our heads to make sure we are glued to our screens 24/7 improving shareholder value of the companies supplying the news on the current crisis.

    So in conclusion, there are some global issues, but there is no reason not to go on an adventure, pursue that girl/boy you like, build a shed, or do whatever “side quest” you are up to at the moment. It’s not like you’re gonna solve climate change alone but you’ll be completely miserable if that is all your life is about. The world is not ending for now, go do your side quests.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 days ago

      Most diseases that would have killed you a few hundred years ago have been solved

      RFK wants to ban vaccines entirely in the US. They’ll come back frighteningly fast if he does that. They’re only “solved” as long as we keep up our vigilance.

      in most of the world slavery has been eradicated.

      There are more slaves alive today than at any point in history.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        But much much less as a percent of population.

        I don’t want to diminish slavery in any way, but the indebted servitude of now is very different to the, for example, Roman concept of slaves as property that you walk through the street with.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

          The 13th amendment specifically allows it, my friend.

          USA has one of the highest prison populations per capita in the world. Further, the only countries that outpace it are small, smaller than most US states. Cuba, Rwanda, El Salvador, Turkmenistan, and American Somoa are the only countries with higher prison populations per capita, and those are all much smaller counties than USA.

          Why do you think the right wing wants to criminalize everything? Because the more people are in prison, the more free labor you have.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yes climate change might bring famine, destructive weather events, or plague but in the meantime we are living in the safest, healthiest, and most technologically advanced era of humanity up until now, especially for those of us living in democracies.

      Don’t take your democracies for granted. If people aren’t around to fight to keep them that way, they don’t last.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I think I disagree about the severity and urgency of some of the things you’re talking about, but I do agree with your sentiment. I restate: the only thing I am criticizing here is the ambiguity of language. It’s the “side quests” that give life flavour, and to give them up to deal with the “real problems” would be choosing to stop living because you’re too worried about surviving.

      But still, strange headline choice.