• Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 个月前

    Actually, allot of countries let some lands for jews, but they don’t want it. They want specifically they holly land.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 个月前

      Source? And is it notably different than from, for example, the land the US government “left” for native Americans? Deliberately too small and unproductive to support the population’s needs?

      • Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 个月前

        Well, in from Argentina and I can say a good and wealthy part of the capital was left for jews in the time, and other parts of o country, and I know some others countries did the same, but that wasn’t well accepted by the time. Still we have some tiny communities in that zones from that time.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 个月前

        Varied by country, the Jewish Oblast was kinda shit, but the land in Alaska had potential for example. The Alaska thing wasnt official just an idea a lot of folks were lightly okay with.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 个月前

          A Jewish reservation. In Alaska.

          Bro…

          Know any other groups of people who might need reservations in Alaska? Know any of them who actually have their rights respected?

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 个月前

            There was also ones proposed in Uganda, southern Argentina, Madagascar, and Tasmania. Though I will note that last one is a bit scarce and I only know of it due to an obscure book from the 1890s.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 个月前

              The Madagascar plan was the Nazis and explicitly designed to starve them all to death. I assume the Tasmanian idea is similar in goal. “Hey, this area will technically fit them all, we don’t need to check how much of the land is arable ;)”

              I don’t think you could create a sovereign space for a couple million refugees in either Uganda Argentina but feel free to correct me.

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 个月前

                I think the Tasmania thing was a throw shit at the wall thing. But you could definitely keep a strong population in southern Argentina, that part of Patagonia is pretty fertile.