One reason to do something like this would be if you were planning to disrupt the international supply chain by perhaps putting tariffs on China, keeping local unions happy to the point where they would not jump on a chance to strike during a supply chain disruption would be an effective way to minimize the adverse effects of tariffs and wars for that matter.

You could also just read this as an appeal to union members who voted for Trump to keep them a part of the Republican coalition.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    Wtf is with them using the word “taps”. Not blaming you OP, it’s clearly in the article’s title. But I see it over and over and over again.

    Not isolated, every time the stock market loses 2% is “plummets” or “plunges”. Every time a fighter jet is sent to intercept something, it’s “scrambled.”

    Like they all use the same lexicon.

    • Garibaldee@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      They were one of the three House Republicans that voted for the Pro Act, the vast minority position among the party, which at least makes it interesting that they were picked, who knows how they will actually operate though

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Another reason is that unions have been getting increasing support from the general population, reversing decades of declining support.