cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17202407

Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) introduced a bill this week to legally erase transgender people, entitled the “Defining Male and Female Act of 2024.” He claimed that the bill will stop what he called the Biden administration’s attempt to “replace biological sex with dangerous radical gender ideology.”

The bill is a long list of terms and definitions, where words like “father” and “girl” are defined with the words “male” and “female.” Those two words are then defined as “an individual who naturally has, had, will have, or would have, but for a congenital anomaly or intentional or unintentional disruption, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports and utilizes [sperm or eggs for male or female, respectively] for fertilization.”

  • webadict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nudity is also not inherently sexual. You can be naked for reasons outside of having sex, such as cleaning yourself, using the bathroom, changing outfits, sunbathing, relaxing, etc. None of those are inherently sexual.

    Wearing drag is not sexual either. It’s been a thing for centuries, and that’s just the easily identifiable stuff.

    Wearing kink gear is not inherently sexual, though I can understand that you don’t recognize that because it has connotations. But you can wear it without it being a sexual act.

    “Expressing” sexuality is purposefully vague. Is kissing expressing sexuality? Is holding hands? Children do those. That would be an expression of your sexual orientation. You aren’t really making any sense.

        • Aermis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s NSFW content? But I thought it’s just innocent expression, safe enough for kids.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Anything that would make your boss go “WTF ARE YOU LOOKING AT??” is NSFW content. You know this. Stop with the dishonest engagement or you’ll grab a ban.

            • Aermis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m not trying to have a dishonest engagement. You’re right. There’s a lot of NSFW that isn’t sexual in nature.

              The engagement I was trying to have is that kids are being involved with displays of sexuality. Seeing how it’s not even a conversation to be had here is telling of the community I’m engaging with.