I’m a researcher. to my knowledge pji is a type of law firm or legal fund, unconfirmed.

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I believe the original purpose of that phrase, was to differentiate between people who act on those attractions, and those who understand it’s wrong and refrain from doing so.

    • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The issue is using the same kind of language as like “Person of Color”, as if pedophilia is an identity rather than an illness.

      If we truly want a neutral clinical name, we’d say something like “Minor Attraction Disorder”. It’s something that’s only permissible if you are actively seeking help and self control like any other disorder that’s prone to harm.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re conflating pedophilia with MAP, which is the very thing they’re trying to combat.

        The difference between MAD and MAP would be if you’re referring to the person or the condition, obviously. And I’m sure you can see why nobody wants to be referred to as a MAD person.

        • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s the thing, you shouldn’t be identifying as a person attracted to minors. You don’t say “I’m a Person of Depression” you say “I have depression”.

          If you’re serious about outlining the minor attraction as a problem you have to struggle with, don’t declare it like an identity to be proud of.

          And if you don’t see it as a problem, you’re just enabling pedophilia. The people inflicted with it need to admit they have an illness to get treated.