• P_P@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    He won. Get this conspiracy bullshit out of here.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      To be fair, it’s been a longstanding rule with Republicans that whatever they accuse others of is merely a projection of what they’ll do the moment they can get away with it. Whether or not they would try to steal an election isn’t even a question. They’ve as much as admitted it. The only question is whether or not they did. I’ve not seen any evidence to that effect, and I’m not presuming there is any, but it would be idiotic not to at least contemplate the possibility.

      • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Have you not heard of any of the shit tons of ballots that got destroyed, forged, and stolen by republicans leading up to the election? Or how they’re not counting a shit ton of provisional ballots in Georgia and tried to get them to be hand counted? I’m p sure other states did that too but I don’t remember

        Edit just realized this sounds kinda rude, not my intention 🌸 I can look for some links if you want

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah probably. But this is a man who has never gotten anything honestly in his entire life. All they do is project, and they just spent years shrieking about this exact thing. Historically, that has meant that they have done/are doing/will do that thing.

      I’m not going to just automatically assume anything, but it would be the least surprising thing ever if it turned out to be true.

    • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Statistically anomalous data exists, it should be scrutinized, just partially. Sample and do a hand recount for 1 district that shows the greatest evidence of bullet ballots, if that turns out close to expectations, that’s the end of it. If it isn’t… that’s a massive can of worms.

      1 anomaly can be seen as a random outlier, and if it wouldn’t impact the overall result, can be ignored. Multiple anomalies, in only the places that matter is worth a little time to confirm.